Skip to main content

3MT Award Recipents 2021

3mt

Three Minute Thesis (3MT™) is a research communication competition developed by The University of Queensland in Australia. It aims to cultivate students’ academic, presentation, and research communication skills. Presenting in a 3MT competition increases students’ capacity to effectively explain their research in three minutes, in a language appropriate to a non-specialist audience

On May 22nd, 2021, the Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences organized the Three Minute Thesis (3MT) Competition. Four successful FENS PhD candidates presented their research, each in three minutes. On this exciting and fun day, after thoughtful deliberation, our panel of guest judges declared the winner.

Sarah Barakat
Sarah Barakat

Winner

Buse Bulut Köpüklü
Buse Bulut Köpüklü

People's Choice

 

Alper Yeşilçubuk
Materials Research and Development Unit, Arçelik

Emre Erol
Emre Erol
Faculty Member, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences & Foundations Development Director

 

Gündüz Ulusoy
Gündüz Ulusoy
Emeritus Faculty Member, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences

 

Murat Germen
Murat Germen
Faculty Member, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences

 

Özgür Gürbüz
Özgür Gürbüz
​​​​​​Faculty Member, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences

 

Program

14:00-14:15  Opening remarks       

14: 15-14:30 Video presentations 

14:30-14:40  Voting for People's Choice Award via Zoom polls   

14:40-14:50  Announcement of the winners 

At every level of the competition, each competitor will be assessed on the judging criteria listed below. Note that participants will record and submit their presentations to the event coordinators.

Comprehension and Content

  • Did the presentation provide an understanding of the background and significance to the research question being addressed, while explaining terminology and avoiding jargon?
  • Did the presentation clearly describe the impact and/or results of the research, including conclusions and outcomes?
  • Did the presentation follow a clear and logical sequence?
  • Was the thesis topic, research significance, results/impact and outcomes communicated in language appropriate to a non-specialist audience?
  • Did the presenter spend adequate time on each element of their presentation - or did they elaborate for too long on one aspect or was the presentation rushed?

Engagement and Communication

  • Did the oration make the audience want to know more?
  • Was the presenter careful not to trivialise or generalise their research?
  • Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for their research?
  • Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience’s attention?
  • Did the speaker have sufficient stage presence, eye contact and vocal range; maintain a steady pace, and have a confident stance?
  • Did the PowerPoint slide enhance the presentation – was it clear, legible, and concise?
  • Please note: competitors *will not* be judged on video/ recording quality or editing capabilities (optional inclusions). Judging will focus on the presentation, ability to communicate research to a non-specialist audience, and 3MT PowerPoint slide.

Pool Result